Published by
Charleston Athenaeum Press
"Historians used to know - and it was not too long ago - that the War Between the States had more to do with economics than it did with slavery. The current obsession with slavery as the "cause" of the war rests not on evidence but on ideological considerations of the present day. Gene Kizer has provided us with the conclusive case that the invasion of the Southern States by Lincoln and his party (a minority of the American people) was due to an agenda of economic domination and not to some benevolent concern for slaves. This book is rich in evidence and telling quotations and ought to be on every Southern bookshelf."
Clyde N. Wilson
Emeritus Distinguished Professor of History
University of South Carolina
"Gene Kizer persuasively shows how the North fought the South out of necessity to prevent economic collapse. No where else is proof of this motive made clearer with indisputable evidence. Mr. Kizer writes with authority from the desire to tell the truth. His common sense style is the product of honesty. One cannot read his work without concluding that this is a man to be trusted."
James Everett Kibler
Professor of English
University of Georgia
Author of
Our Fathers' Fields; Walking Toward Home;
and many other outstanding books
OPT OUT: If you have received this e-mail in error, or do not want to receive any others, please accept my apology and reply back with "Remove" in the subject line and I will remove you promptly.
|
Messages from John T. Hughes Camp #614 Sons of Confederate Veterans. We are constantly looking for news and information related to Southern Heritage and the War Between The States.
Monday, April 27, 2015
Slavery Was Not the Cause of the War Between the States, The Irrefutable Argument. -- FUNDRAISING for Camps, Chapters, Units; DONATING by Individuals
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Fwd: Mark Your Calendar for May 1-2
|
Labels:
Missouri History
Saturday, April 25, 2015
Fwd: SCV Telegraph- Heritage Alert - Please Vote Now
|
Friday, April 24, 2015
Message Regarding the St. Louis Monument From Mo Division Commander Maples
Gentlemen,
A bit of an update this morning. Quite a day yesterday, indeed. I have spoken with National Heritage Defense Chairman Ben Jones (Cooter from the Dukes of Hazzard days), and he was already aware of this and of course in our corner. He is going to try to submit an "op-ed" to the St. Louis Post Dispatch for starters, and will also stay on this and continue to be in contact with me. I have also been in contact with our own Heritage Defense Chairman - Bob Arnold, who is living in the St. Louis area. Bob is very well versed with the politics of St. Louis, and is a Confederate "guru" so to speak. We are fortunate to have him. Bob has informed me that the so called committee is most likely a "kangaroo court" and in his opinion, these folks have most likely already formed their opinions, etc. No surprise there, right? Bob has also given me some excellent advice and will be at my side as I deal with this. Today, I will be calling the Mayors office, and I am requesting a meeting with him. I have already sent an email requesting the meeting, but have not heard back as of yet. I am also going to request that WE, the Missouri SCV be included on his committee. As descendants of the Confederate soldiers represented on the monument, we have a right to be included on any committee regarding them. We will see just what the Mayor's response will be.
I am confident that threatening the Mayor's office will be of no good. That's what they want. So let us be careful in our words and in our deeds. We have only begun to fight, and I again ask for your prayers as I deal with these people of no common sense. We will be using our social media outlets and everything we have at our disposal to resist this.
Darrell Maples - Commander
Missouri Division - SCV
Don't miss the deadline for the Reunion and Reconciliation Lecture Series
|
Labels:
Missouri History
Thursday, April 23, 2015
To the Honorable Mayor Slay of St. Louis
1200 Market , Room 200
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
Dear Sir,
It has unfortunately come to my recent attention, that you have
contemplated the possibility of moving the Confederate monument at Forest
Park and renaming Confederate Drive. The monument, coexisting with it’s
Union counterpart, is a testament to the terrible split our state suffered
during the war. Let me be frank, this should not happen.
This would be a violation of what the great historian Shelby Foote
called “The Great Compromise” in which “Southerners [admitted] freely that
it was probably best that the Union wasn’t divided and Northerners
[admitting] rather freely that the South fought bravely for a cause in
which it believed.” That doesn’t seem to be happening much anymore.
Regardless of our individual feelings on the war, that is how the veterans
of both sides saw it in later years. A few of those alive today hold to
this way of thinking but a vast many more do not.
This would also be an insult to American veterans. According to
Public Law 85-425 (House Resolution 358), which was a pension increase for
American veterans and their widows, dated May 23rd, 1958: “The term
‘Veteran’ includes a person who served in the military or naval forces of
the Confederate States of America during the Civil War, and the term
‘active, military or naval service’ includes active service in such
forces.”
St. Louis was indeed a (mostly) Pro-Union hotbed during the war but the whole story needs to continue being told.
The monument stands for the minority who chose to take up arms and defend their
state against what they saw as an aggressor. St. Louis German immigrants,
enlisted as Union soldiers, literally massacred twenty-eight civilians in
the streets of the city. This incited many people, throughout the city and
state, to flock to the colors of Missouri and the South to defend against
atrocity and invasion. This should not be underplayed as a motive as it
unfortunately has been. Slavery was a brutal and terrible system but, here
in Missouri especially, slaveholders occupied the ranks of BOTH sides
during the conflict. Preservation / Abolition of the institution of
slavery has been vastly overplayed at the expense of every other issue of the times. Their needs to
be more honesty on the role that slavery played in American history and the
war. Perhaps a “primary source” reading of what St. Louis Confederates were
fighting for is in order.
I request that you reconsider following through with this terrible idea.
Yours Truly and Respectfully,
Travis Archie - Commander
Campbell's Company Camp # 2252
Sons of Confederate Veterans
Republic, Missouri
Labels:
Heritage Defense
Contact the Saint Louis Mayor's Office about Confederate Monument
Have you seen the controversial blog post published by the St. Louis Mayor? We have the content at the following link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5CWCdYomZ9pdjFjNkFNek91QTA/view?usp=sharing
Or you can see it on the Mayor's site at:
https://www.mayorslay.com/from-fgs/confederate-monument-forest-park
Please contact the Mayor's Office and discuss your opposition to the removal of the Confederate Memorial in Forest Park.
Phone: (314) 622-3201
Address:
1200 Market , Room 200
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
1200 Market , Room 200
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
Labels:
Heritage Defense
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay is seeking a special committee to consider whether the city's Confederate Memorial should be moved out of Forest Park.
Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2015/04/22/3777553_committee-to-weigh-future-of-confederate.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
ST. LOUIS — The 32-foot memorial to the Civil War's fallen Confederate soldiers has towered for a century near the visitors center of St. Louis' sprawling Forest Park. Now, the granite shaft faces its own brewing battle over its place there along "Confederate Drive."
Mayor Francis Slay, believing the landmark's centennial and rekindled national dialogue about race relations make the time ripe for assessing its place in the park, has asked three agencies to decide what, if anything, to do with it, "with the benefit of a longer view of history."
Chief options include doing nothing, as the Missouri chapter of a national Confederacy ancestry group advocates, saying any messing with the monument runaway is political correctness and a bid to erase history. The memorial dating to 1914 also could be relocated to what Slay calls "a more appropriate setting," or simply be allowed to stay put but modified with an inscription better describing the realities of slavery.
"Another reappraisal (of the landmark's place) is due," Slay wrote in his blog Tuesday in announcing his asking the Missouri History Museum, the nonprofit Forest Park Forever and the Incarnate Word Foundation to study the landmark's placement.
That scrutiny comes against the backdrop of the nation's continued grappling with race relations, lately in the months and protests that followed last summer's shooting death of black 18-year-old Michael Brown by white police officer Darren Wilson in nearby Ferguson.
Giving a fresh evaluation of the Confederate monument in what had been a border state during the Civil War "is timely in the context of social conflict in our community," said Eddie Roth, St. Louis' director of human services.
Darrell Maples, commander of Sons of Confederate Veterans' Missouri chapter, considers Slay's push "an affront on history."
"We can't change history, and we don't want to change history," Maples, a 55-year-old retired information technology worker from Jefferson City, said Wednesday after sending Slay an emailed request for a meeting. "We're living in a politically correct world that has just gone crazy, and our position is, 'Where does it stop?'"
"I feel this is just another attempt to erase a part of history that somebody may not like," Maples added. "We're kind of perplexed by all of this, and we're asking, 'Why now?'
Roth said labeling fresh reflection about the landmark as simply political correctness is "wrong.
"The precise opposite is true. This is about facing up to our history and having adult conversations about it," Roth said. "It's hard to think (the monument) was not designed to be provocative, so let it provoke good conversation about history and where we're going as a community."
Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2015/04/22/3777553_committee-to-weigh-future-of-confederate.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
http://www.abc17news.com/missouri-news/committee-to-weigh-future-of-confederate-memorial/32503864
http://www.bnd.com/2015/04/22/3777553_committee-to-weigh-future-of-confederate.html?rh=1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)