Thursday, July 9, 2015

Call Your Congress Men Today!!!

Compatriots,

Today the U.S. House of Representatives will be voting on whether to permanently ban the Confederate Flag from all Federal cemeteries regardless if Confederate soldiers, sailors, marines or civilian are buried there or not.

I urgently request that you contact a US Representative today and tell them to vote no and ask for a written reply back.  Please use the links below to help with the phone numbers of your members of both the Senate and House.

House of Representatives

U. S. Senate
  
Friends, time is of the essence, so act now. 

Sincerely, 

Charles Kelly Barrow

Commander-in-Chief
Sons of Confederate Veterans
@scvcic
www.scv.org 

US House Looking to Remove CSA Flags from ALL US Cemeteries

Gentlemen,



This is in my mind the greatest threat we face right now – the banning of 
Confederate flags over our men’s graves on federal property.  This is an 
INSULT!



http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/247171-house-votes-to-ban-confederate-flags-at-federal-cemeteries



http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/House-moves-to-ban-Confederate-flag-in-federal-6372880.php



Mike



Michael L. Landree

Executive Director

Sons of Confederate Veterans

P.O. Box 59

Columbia, TN 38402

Flight to Exile and Freedom in the Confederacy



From: bernhard1848@gmail.com

Former Vice President John C. Breckinridge sat in the US Senate as a representative of Kentucky in July 1861. He denounced Lincoln's concentration of power in Washington as an act "which, in every age of the world, has been the very definition of despotism." He also saw the Republican party using the war to change the very character of our government, and the reduction of the resisting State's into territories governed by Lincoln's appointees.

Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.com

Flight to Exile and Freedom in the Confederacy

"On September 18 [1861], the Kentucky legislature formally ended neutrality and took the side of the Union. The arrests began the same night, and among the first to be taken was former Governor [Charles] Morehead of Louisville. At the same time, the pro-Southern Louisville Courier was suppressed. That same day several men throughout the nation advised Washington authorities that Breckinridge should be arrested.

The Republican Cassius Clay, who believed that "John C. Breckinridge . . . was never at heart a Secessionist." Even a bearded little Union general, U.S. Grant, sympathized with the senator in some degree. "He was among the last to go over to the South," Grant would say, "and was rather dragged into the position."

He had fought for compromise and failed; he had sought peace and moderation and found only bitterness; and had proclaimed his devotion to the Union to the best of his ability . . . He was an innocent man, but he would be taken, denied his rights, and like Morehead, spirited away to a prison deep in the North to sit for months without hope.

On October 8, 1861, from Bowling Green, he issued his last address as a statesman, and his first as a Confederate. He returned the trust given him to represent Kentucky in the Senate, he said. He could no longer keep it. He had tried to stand for the State's wishes in Washington, he had opposed Lincoln's war policy at every step, even to refusing Kentucky's men and money . . . "I resign," he said, "because there is no place left where a Southern Senator may sit in council with the Senators of the North. In truth, there is no longer a Senate of the United States within the meaning and spirit of the Constitution."

The Union no longer existed, he continued, Lincoln had assumed dictatorial powers. The rights of person and property were being flagrantly violated every day. Unlawful arrests were the rule. The subjugation and conquest of the South were the rallying cries in the Federal Congress.

As for Kentucky, her rights of neutrality had been violated repeatedly, arms secretly supplied to Federal sympathizers, troops unlawfully raised within her borders, the legislature intimidated and packed with the minions of Washington, freedoms of speech, press, and assembly, restricted, and hundreds forced to flee their homes for safety. He explained his own flight to avoid arrest, saying he would have welcomed it if he had any assurance that it would have been followed by a trial of judge and jury, but he knew that would not be.

Would Kentucky stand by while all of this went on? Would she consent to the usurpations of Lincoln and his hirelings; would she suffer her children to be imprisoned and exiled by the "German mercenaries" that the Union was enlisting to fights its war? Never, he said.

Whatever might be the future relations of the two nations, the old Union could never again be reunited as it once was. He wanted peace between the them lest one conquer the other and the result be military despotism. To defend his own birthright and that of his fellow Kentuckians who had been denied the protection due them, and were forced to choose between arrest, exile, or resistance, he now exchanged the "with proud satisfaction, a term of six years in the Senate of the United States for the musket of a soldier." As one of those forced to make that choice, he said, "I intend to resist."

(Breckinridge, Statesman, Soldier, Symbol, William C. Davis, LSU Press, 1974, pp. 287- 290)

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

VA SCV Plates

From: henryruss@comcast.net
June 29, 2015
Honorable Richard D. Holcomb
Commissioner
Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
RE: Ban on issuance of SCV specialty plate 
Dear Commissioner Holcomb:

In 1999, the Virginia General Assembly approved a specialty license plate for the Sons of Confederate Veterans but unconstitutionally censored the use of the Confederate Battle Flag. The Confederate Battle flag has been part of our organization's logo since the SCV was founded over 119 years ago. Although the Assembly had permitted dozens of organizations to use their logos on specialty plates, the SCV is the only group the Assembly has ever forbidden to display its logo on a license plate. The Sons of Confederate Veterans filed a civil rights lawsuit challenging the Commonwealth's actions as a denial of their right of free speech. In April 2002 a 3 judge panel of the 4th Circuit United States Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that the State of Virginia had violated the 1st Amendment rights of the Virginia Sons of Confederate Veterans and ordered the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles to begin issuing specialty tags bearing our Confederate Battle flag themed logo.

On June 23, 2015, Governor McAuliffe stated that he would "move quickly" to erase the Confederate flag from state license plates. I have already received calls from the VaDMV, undoubtedly in an attempt to discuss new logo options with me.

What the Governor and you seem to forget is that our Confederate Battle flag plates did not come through the offices, largesse and goodwill of the Governor, the General Assembly or the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, but by a Court order issued by the 4th Circuit United States Court of appeal. (Decision attached if the Governor and you have mislaid your copies).

I am aware of no order from the 4th Circuit vacating our right to receive our plates from the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles and on behalf of ALL the citizens of the Commonwealth I insist that you follow the rule of Law. If you desire to cease issuing SCV plates on the lie that they are "hurtful" and "divisive," then I demand that you follow proper legal procedure by filing a proper Motion to Vacate in a United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, so that we may have a venue outside of the current orchestrated witch hunt to properly respond.

Whatever the cost, the Virginia Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans will oppose the Governor's attempt to stymie the rights of all Virginians by picking on groups of citizens he believes are vulnerable & unpopular. This tactic, very old, used to be called "McCarthyism."

Deo Vindice,
L. Tracy Clary
Commander
Virginia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans 
Cc: Governor Terry McAuliffe

In Defense of Symbols: Southern and Otherwise



From: bernhard1848@gmail.com

Eminent Southern historian Sam Francis clearly saw that the demands to remove symbols of our Confederate past would not be confined to them alone, but "extends to symbols associated with other ethnic groups" and America's Western heritage in general.

Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.com

In Defense of Symbols: Southern and Otherwise

"One of the most ironic aspects of the attack on Southern symbols is that what is really a revolutionary onslaught, an attack intended to erase the symbols of a regional and even national heritage and thereby to alter the meaning of that heritage, is now supported by not only far-left groups like the NAACP and its racial allies but also by the ostensible conservatives.

In the last battle over the Confederate flag in South Carolina it was the Republicans who had to be watched and it was they who eventually voted to remove the flag from the capitol dome.

During the primaries last winter, it was Republican John McCain who first denounced the flag as a symbol of "racism and slavery" and then backed away from that statement, only to return to it again after the South Carolina primary. It was President George W. Bush who refused to say anything in support of the flag other than it was really a State issue, which was the easy way out, but it was Mr. Bush's administration in Texas that only recently ordered plaques commemorative of the Confederacy removed from the Texas Supreme Court building.

And it was the force of big business that demanded that South Carolina settle the flag controversy in a way that the NAACP would approve of because the continuation of the controversy, their spokesman said, would be disruptive to business.

[What I] would like to emphasize here today that the attack on the Confederate flag and Confederate symbols is merely a prelude, a kind of dress rehearsal, for a larger and even more radical attack on all symbols of American heritage and American civilization.

The attack on Confederate symbols is coming first simply because, given the demonization of the South and the Confederacy in recent years, they are easier targets. But make no mistake, these are not the last symbols that will come under attack, and already we can see the attacks beginning as those on the Confederate symbols succeed.

For example, in 1997 . . . the Orleans Parish [Louisiana] school board, with a 5-2 black majority, voted unanimously to change the name of George Washington Elementary to [black surgeon] Dr. Charles Richard Drew Elementary; the school itself is 91 percent black. [New Orleans "civil rights" leader Carl Galmon stated]: "To African Americans, George Washington has about as much meaning as David Duke."

In 1996, white former Marxist historian Conor Cruise O'Brien published an article in the Atlantic Monthly arguing that Thomas Jefferson should no longer be included in the national pantheon because of his "racism." And indeed, the [Jefferson's] Declaration [of Independence] itself, supposedly the document that serves as the very basis for racial equality in this country, is also rejected by black extremists. In February, 1999 in New Jersey [a bill to require public school students to memorize parts of the Declaration was withdrawn after] angry attacks on it by black lawmakers.

Indeed, it would probably be hard to find a figure from American history who has not come under attack from black racists. [Black reparations advocate Randall Robinson writes that] "America must dramatically reconfigure its symbolized picture of itself, its national parks, museums, monuments, statues, artworks must be recast in a way to include African-Americans."

It does not seem to matter to Mr. Robinson that the historical events many of these cultural monuments to the American past commemorate might not have included blacks; the past must be recreated to include them.

Of course, the major defeat for the flag so far has been in South Carolina, where the legislature voted to remove the flag from its place above the capitol dome and to put it on a monument nearby. That wasn't enough for the NAACP, which has refused to call off its boycott of the State and wants the flag removed. Last week, when the flag was actually removed, the NAACP's State director in South Carolina said, "The economic sanctions will continue until the flag no longer flies."

(Shots Fired, Sam Francis on America's Culture War, Peter B. Gemma, FGF Books, 2006, excerpts pp. 277-283)

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Confederate Flag



From: cscitizen@windstream.net
To: ghanner@thestclairtimes.com

To the Editor:
                     
For the last couple of weeks it's been interesting & upsetting to watch the white liberals & black activist clamor for the banning of everything Confederate. Some have even carried this modern day form of Nazi book burning so far as to call for the banning of the American Flag & the Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C. What`s to be purged next in Obama`s United Socialist States of America`s Stalinist purge?
 
The difference from my side of the fence as compared to theirs is, if I do not like something, disagree with it or it offends me I live with it because I know its history & everyone sees parts of history as good or bad but, its still history & history should not be rewritten, censored, banned or changed in any form.
 
The left which declares itself to be tolerant, inclusive, diverse & welcomes everyone in is a lie. They only feel this way if you agree with everything they believe, want the same thing`s they want & are just like them. Otherwise, they do to those with different likes & opinions as they accuse the other side of doing to them. Which blows away their claims of inclusiveness, tolerance & being a diverse group with room for everyone & where every race, creed, color & religion are welcomed. So long as you like or hate everything they do.
 
It's clear to me the left does not understand or does not want to understand that being a real American means to live & let live & if you want respect you have to give respect to others, their history & symbols even if they offend you. Every nationality in America has a different background, history & culture. If those on the left refuse to understand this then it is they who are the threat to the social fabric that makes this country America.
 
The left has an agenda to push using everyone, their history, culture & symbols against them. Obama, with the lefts help, has fundamentally transformed America into a racial pressure cooker with little hope left for anyone. The rest of us just wish to be left alone to be Americans so we can celebrate & enjoy America`s differences, not ban them. This includes Southerners who are a part of America & the things that are theirs as well.

Billy E. Price
Ashville, Al.

"We Are All Southerners Now"


The late Southern writer and historian Sam Francis often noted the war against traditional American culture and that Southern symbols were first in line because they were easy targets. He understood that "those pushing these attacks are driven by their own racial and class hatreds . . . [and] feels little identity with most of American history and regards it largely as a nightmare from which it is trying to awaken."
Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.com

"We Are All Southerners Now"
"What is also going on with the attack on the Confederate flag, on the part of the groups like the NAACP and the blacks it represents, is a kind of racial secession from American society. When blacks say that George Washington is the equivalent of David Duke or denounce or reject the major icons of our history as bigots and hatemonger, they are in effect saying that they are not part of the society that adopts these symbols.
What demonstrators in the NAACP's march against the flag in South Carolina carried signs that said: "Your Heritage is Our Slavery," they are essentially announcing that they rejected the heritage of the State and indeed the nation, and in rejecting the heritage they were also rejecting the nation itself.
But many of the blacks are not really announcing their secession from the nation. What they are announcing is their intention to reconfigure the nation, to use political power based on their own racial solidarity to redefine the nation and its heritage in terms that will be acceptable to them.
At the same time blacks also demand racial integration, affirmative action, and reparations, they are also demanding that the whites with whom they are to be integrated and from whom they are demanding special privileges give up their own symbols and heroes and actually adopt those of blacks – Arthur Ashe, civil rights leaders, Martin Luther King, etc.
What we are seeing in this concerted and protracted attack on Southern and even national and other ethnic symbols, my friends, is nothing less than a crusade for the overthrow of any symbol that suggests white – dare I say the real – heritage and history of this country and their replacement by their own symbols and their own racial propaganda and mythology.
The slogans of "color blindness" and racial neutrality that lay behind the rhetoric of the civil rights movement have failed and have been abandoned by the blacks themselves. What is now being asserted is not the demand to be accepted into white institutions but the demand that white institutions be turned over to non-whites and that non-whites occupy the same positions of dominance that whites once held.
[In much] of the white South and the rest of the country, [blacks] are able to play on white guilt and cowardice to gain their demands. Hispanics also are increasing playing it, especially in areas like California where they will soon be a majority of the population.
Unless whites – Southerners as well as non-Southerners – learn to have the courage to demand that the symbols of their heritage and their identity be respected and honored in the places where they have always been respected and honored, what we can expect to see, as whites cease to be a majority in the country, is the continuing destruction of those symbols and with them the heritage and identity they symbolize.
It is really a war against the entire nation, and the entire civilization and the people that formed them, and we can win that war only when we make others in the nation and civilization grasp that they are next, that the symbols that define their identity are no more immune from being denounced as "racist" than ours are.
In a word, what we need to teach those who are now among our enemies but who should be on our side is that we are all Southerners now."


(Shots Fired, Sam Francis on America's Culture War, Peter B. Gemma, editor, FGF Books, 2006, excerpts, pp. 285-286)